Urth Net

← back to the conversation

5HC : Skinner, Turing (fwd)

James Wynn · 07 Feb 2005, 06:55 · from 2005-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: thewynns at earthlink.net (James Wynn)
Date: Mon Feb  7 06:55:23 2005
Subject: (urth) 5HC : Skinner, Turing (fwd)
References: <BAY102-F386AA87A01B0267D0A719B9730 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <00f601c50d25$0b3faa80$4c1e4b0a at vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>


>>I am not sure where Hume's fork comes into play here. The fork, as I
>>understand it, isn't about determinism or randomness.
>>
>Curses.  My memory is as bad as ever.  I'm sure I have seen it called that
>somewhere.  But you're probably right.  It is an argument I've seen
>attributed to Hume, though.

Hmmm...seems like a pretty cynical philosophy. It works for all the choices
people never have to make and begins to teeter when we consider all the ones
they do. How does it explain why people cheat on their spouses? How does it
explain why they don't? How does it explain heroism and cowardice?
Generosity and greed? Honesty and duplicity? How about twelve-step programs?
How does it explain listening to free-form jazz?

~ Crush

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net