urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 7, Issue 6

Kieran Mullen · 22 Mar 2005, 09:43 · from 2005-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: kieran at ou.edu (Kieran Mullen)
Date: Tue Mar 22 09:43:45 2005
Subject: (urth) Re: urth-urth.net Digest, Vol 7, Issue 6
In-Reply-To: <20050321234958.01A6884D2B at che.dreamhost.com>
References: <20050321234958.01A6884D2B at che.dreamhost.com>
Message-ID: <4f6a8691322cd7853123fe2c88ad8ab7 at ou.edu>

>
> This is reminiscent of Kierkegaard's [1] problem of Abraham in 'Fear 
> and
> Trembling'.
>
> The problem being:
>
> 1)  Abraham is credited with being moral and the father of the faith.
>
> 2)  He almost sacrificed his son because God told him to.
>
> 3)  If _I_ did that, I'd be regarded as slightly psychotic.
>
> 4)  So why is 1) regarded as true?

My favorite answer to this was the one provided by Dan Simmons in the 
Hyperion novels.    One of his characters claims that actually Abraham 
had to go through with this because he was testing God.  That is, any 
God who would actually make you go through with such a demand was not 
worth worshiping.  He had to carry it out to the end to see what would 
happen.




> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:48:50 -0600
> From: "James Wynn" <thewynns at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: (urth) OT - Watchmen on trial
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
> Message-ID: <003601c52e70$add1cd70$60a3f63f@wynnhouse>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> 	reply-type=original
>
>> Blattid said
>> No. [The Watchmen is] not a "profoundly fascist" work. It is a 
>> profound
>> work_about_fascism. Gaaaaah.
>
> I'd be interested in your explanation of how it was "about" fascism 
> rather
> than founded on it. I'm not sure how you can say Alan Moore did not
> **embrace** the most fascistic elements of the comic book superhero 
> genre in
> "The Watchmen". Are you suggesting Ozy is presented as anything but a 
> hero?
>

I never thought Ozymandias was a hero in The Watchmen.  It seems odd to 
even contemplate!   He's so clearly the proud, self-impressed villain.  
He's eeeeeevil.    That's the point of the pirate comic - the 
protagonist acts so single-mindedly that he realizes in the end he's 
become as bad as the pirates he hated.

> In a shameless rip-off of this theme, Moore has Mr. Manhattan justify
> Ozymandias' actions for exactly the same reasons that Com. Gordon 
> justified
> Batman's ("it's too big"). Then M.M. turns the only true common-man 
> hero in
> the story (Rorschach) to a pile of dust to stop him from undermining 
> O's
> scheme.

Hmmm.... I wouldn't call it shameless.  It would be very odd if this 
argument were not made.  We see it made all the time today, justifying 
all sorts of things.

Of course, we know that MM's action ultimately is a failure - Rorshach 
mailed out the journal to the newspapers.   I think Watchmen is about 
the dehumanizing effect of power.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2554 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20050322/e43e6324/attachment.bin

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net