Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Snootiness of Gene Wolfe

Thomas Womack · 01 Mar 2004, 09:04 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2004.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Thomas Womack <twomack at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Subject: Re: The Snootiness of Gene Wolfe
Date: 01 Mar 2004 09:04:59 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <pQg*U8leq at news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <Xns949D9FE6F929Difyouwanttoemailvisi at 199.45.49.11> <c21d3ba0.0402290659.37671483 at posting.google.com> <+tv*P4jeq at news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <394d822b.0402291845.58775386 at posting.google.com>

>Thomas Womack <twomack at chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message news:<+tv*P4jeq at news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>...
>> The book that's really impressed me recently is Dorothy Dunnett's
>> "Niccolo Rising"; absolutely superb pacing, and a really compelling
>> environment, quite substantially thanks to everything being told in
>> a well-calibrated omniscient third-person.

>To me it's odd that you would find Wolfe's unreliable narrator
>infuriating but you're not bothered by Dunnett's practice of having
>vitally important matters take place offstage then having the
>characters refer to them as if the reader ought to know what they're
>talking about.  Gradually, of course, the reader clues in.

I rather like that approach, in Dunnett and in GG Kay (with writers
that good using it, it must have something to commend itself); it
keeps my poor brain from atrophying, and offers an interestingly
different sort of dramatic irony.  I'm much more convinced that there
is a Big Story of which the characters we're reading know parts than I
am from Wolfe.

>The Niccolo books just get better and better, by the way.  Dunnett was
>as good a historical novelist as Cecilia Holland, and that's saying
>something.

I'm looking forward to the next ones, as soon as the library's
catalogue server comes back on-line and I can actually order them ...
_Niccolo Rising_ I proselytised enthusiastically about, and lent out
to a friend the day I'd finished it.

Who's Cecilia Holland?  Georgette Heyer's real name, or some other
writer I've not yet had the privilege to encounter?

Tom

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net