Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Snootiness of Gene Wolfe

Chris Thompson · 07 Mar 2004, 21:21 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2004.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: cet1 at cus.cam.ac.uk (Chris Thompson)
Subject: Re: The Snootiness of Gene Wolfe
Date: 7 Mar 2004 21:21:34 GMT
Message-ID: <c2g3ou$s56$1 at pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <Xns949D9FE6F929Difyouwanttoemailvisi at 199.45.49.11> <168f035a.0403021608.7dc7d1c2 at posting.google.com> <c27chc$6ac$1 at news01.cit.cornell.edu>

In article <c27chc$6ac$1 at news01.cit.cornell.edu>,
Ron Henry <ronhenry at blahblahblah.clarityconnectcom> wrote:
>> Josh <if.you.want.to.email at visit.joshbrain.tripod.org> wrote in
>message news:
>
>> > Of course, I really should offer support for this assertion. (Well,
>> > sudden realization anyway). Consider that the entire justification
>for
>> > Severian was that Wolfe wanted to write a character who would make a
>good
>> > halloween costume (this was revealed in an interview).
>>
>> This was probably said half-jokingly. Many artists like to play with
>> interviewers, especially with regards to the "cookie-cutter" questions
>> they ask. I would take that with a grain of salt.
>
>Well, I think Wolfe was sincere that he flashed on an image while
>thinking about costume balls at cons, and that this gave him ideas that
>led to the look of the torturers' guild -- but the real problem here is
>misrepresentation and overstatement by the original poster. To say that
>"the entire justification for Severian" was an idea for a "Halloween
>costume" is to grossly misrepresent Wolfe's comments. I read the
>interview he's referring to, and it's just a case of when Wolfe got a
>germ of an idea that, over time, evolved into a character. Long
>consideration of that character, in turn, lead to Wolfe beginning the
>New Sun books.

Wolfe also tells the story about the masquerade in "Helioscope" 
(originally written for _Empire_, but reprinted in _The Castle of 
the Otter_). It needs to be read in context, of course. But perhaps 
the most relevant comment is Wolfe's own (also in TCotO):

GW> You've now read two quite different pieces describing the way in 
GW> which _The Book of the New Sun_ came to be written. I wasn't lying 
GW> in either---writing's a complex process, and if I wanted to I could
GW> do a third piece giving quite different explanations. They, also,
GW> would be true.

Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 [at] cam.ac.uk

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net