Questions about Book of the New Sun
Mike Ward · 11 Sep 2004, 14:48
· from rec.arts.sf.written.2004.mbox
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Mike Ward <m at d.w> Subject: Re: Questions about Book of the New Sun Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:48:14 GMT Message-ID: <OeE0d.347156$OB3.22522 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written References: <ec6dce8b.0409081746.43ac0c7 at posting.google.com> <20040909120112.25562.00000378 at mb-m29.aol.com> <MPG.1bab91b8351f32879898cf at News.Individual.net> >> My advice is to just go with the flow, lots of stuff will be made >> more clear later on, some other stuff won't. I found reading _Book >> of the New Sun_ to be a "project," like reading _In Search of Lost >> Time_, but like Proust, a project that rewarded my efforts. I have >> only read _Book of the New Sun_ once, but I suspect it is very >> profitable to reread it, again like Proust, several volumes of which >> I enjoyed more the second time around. And don't be afraid to >> consult the Oxford English Dictionary or google or something for >> those archaic words; I found this helpful at times. >> > > > Make sure you read Urth of the New Sun when you've finished with the > BotNS series. > > Is it really neccessary. I didn't think it was nearly as good and found it unneccessary. And since I've read it I've almost forgot everything that happened in it even though I remember _The Book of the New Sun_ fine. Mike
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net