_The Wizard_ by Gene Wolfe - too much like previous Wolfe

JavaJosh · 05 Nov 2005, 09:36 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2005.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "JavaJosh" <javajosh at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: _The Wizard_ by Gene Wolfe - too much like previous Wolfe
Date: 5 Nov 2005 01:36:13 -0800
Message-ID: <1131183373.953697.104340 at g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <1131110580.237908.247530 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1131155926.362586.111770 at g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <dp8om1tedg5g5lltds3chekrbiqtudhvd8 at 4ax.com>

Howard Brazee wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2005 17:58:46 -0800, "JavaJosh" <javajosh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have to admit that I'm a little suprised that these reviews haven't
> >sparked more conversation. Is the subject uninteresting? Is my review
> >really that badly done that it doesn't inspire any critical thoughts?
>
> I tended to agree with them.   So I didn't have much to say.

What is it about Wolfe that fails to spark controversy?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net