Urth Net

← back to the conversation

_The Wizard_ by Gene Wolfe - too much like previous Wolfe

Mike Schilling · 07 Nov 2005, 23:21 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2005.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: _The Wizard_ by Gene Wolfe - too much like previous Wolfe
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:21:10 GMT
Message-ID: <GjRbf.9594$BZ5.2888 at newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <1131110580.237908.247530 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1131155926.362586.111770 at g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <dp8om1tedg5g5lltds3chekrbiqtudhvd8 at 4ax.com> <1131183373.953697.104340 at g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <m3acgjuhwf.fsf at localhost.localdomain> <1131217562 at sheol.org> <slrndmv970.vma.scs at lokkur.dexter.mi.us> <m3pspc549s.fsf at localhost.localdomain>

"Thomas Lindgren" <***********@*****.***> wrote in message 
news:m3pspc549s.fsf at localhost.localdomain...
>
> Steve Simmons <scs at not.di.these.org.words> writes:
>
>> For some reason, people who don't get Wolfe seem to realize that there's
>> something in there that they just didn't get.  Most other authors that
>> people don't get they don't get that they don't get.
>
> You wouldn't be looking for a post as Secretary of Defense, would you?

Dammit, you evaluate an author with the preconceptions you've got, not the 
ones you'd like to have.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net