Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Blish's "Conscience" vs. Wolfe's "Fifth Head"

galt_57 at hotmail.com · 28 Dec 2005, 18:36 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2005.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "galt_57 at hotmail.com" <galt_57 at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Blish's "Conscience" vs. Wolfe's "Fifth Head"
Date: 28 Dec 2005 10:36:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1135795018.842798.188130 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <1135781723.546189.19520 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <douf3o$bho$1 at news.datemas.de>

westprog wrote:
> > Contrasting the stories "A Case of Conscence" and "The Fifth Head of
> > Cerberus" on the topic of religious redemption and inherent mortal
> > flaws I am dismayed that Wolfe seems to want to hide a rather ignorant
> > religious opinion
>
> An ignorant opinion?

Cloning and the genetic improvement of humankind is purely evil and
doomed to failure.

> > under layers of elaborate blather.
>
> One person's elaborate blather is someone else's wonderful writing.

Ok, it is wonderful writing but there is a dead skunk buried in the
middle of it.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net