Blish's "Conscience" vs. Wolfe's "Fifth Head"

galt_57 at hotmail.com · 28 Dec 2005, 22:57 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2005.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "galt_57 at hotmail.com" <galt_57 at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Blish's "Conscience" vs. Wolfe's "Fifth Head"
Date: 28 Dec 2005 14:57:30 -0800
Message-ID: <1135810650.498075.97470 at g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <1135781723.546189.19520 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <douf3o$bho$1 at news.datemas.de> <1135795018.842798.188130 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43b2ecc8$0$314$8046368a at newsreader.iphouse.net> <1135802577.600104.325410 at g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43b2ffd3$0$815$8046368a at newsreader.iphouse.net>

Dan Goodman wrote:
> galt_57 at hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > Dan Goodman wrote:
> > > galt_57 at hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > westprog wrote:
> > > > > <galt_57 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > Contrasting the stories "A Case of Conscence" and "The Fifth
> > > > > > Head of Cerberus" on the topic of religious redemption and
> > > > > > inherent mortal flaws I am dismayed that Wolfe seems to want
> > > > > > to hide a rather ignorant religious opinion
> > > > >
> > > > > An ignorant opinion?
> > > >
> > > > Cloning and the genetic improvement of humankind is purely evil
> > > > and doomed to failure.
> > >
> > > You've given no evidence that the opinion is ignorant.
> > >
> > > I do hope you don't mean that 1) the opinion is wrong and 2) anyone
> > > who is not ignorant will realize that it's wrong.
> >
> > Oh no, I believe that very, very intelligent people can and are
> > hoodwinked by religion and accept its presumption of moral authority.
> > I also accept that being hoodwinked is not the same thing as being
> > ignorant.
>
> So, what leads you to the conclusion that Wolfe's opinion is an
> ignorant one?

Because clones are evil, you see. They just are.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net