Severian - unreliable narrator?

vivian · 04 Aug 2006, 17:02 · from rec.arts.sf.written.2006.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: vivian <darkbloom at ru.com>
Subject: Re: Severian - unreliable narrator?
Date: 4 Aug 2006 12:02:02 -0500
Message-ID: <rru6d29eld646ooa227td43i90qncsa83i at 4ax.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
References: <1154702938.622857.74150 at b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

On 4 Aug 2006 07:48:58 -0700, adrianmarley at yahoo.co.uk wrote:

>I'm currently working my way through Gene Wolfe's _Book of the New
>Sun_. I have read quite a bit about this work and know that it is very
>highly regarded among sf critics and fans. A lot of what I've read,
>though, refers to Severian as being an unreliable narrator.
>
>My question is this: In what way is Severian unreliable? Can anybody
>point out specific instances of where is being unreliable or where he
>is telling lies?
>
>Cheers,
>Adrian.

Adrian:

The Wolfe on-line discussion list is filled with information like you
request, but is somewhat difficult to search given its massive amount
of posts. Here, at any rate, are two that may help:

http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0028/0427.shtml

http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0307/3619.txt.shtml

viv

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net