Gene Wolfe: Book of the New Sun
ph · 15 Feb 1986, 16:29
· from net.sf-lovers.1986.mbox
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: ph at wucec2.UUCP Subject: Re: Re: Gene Wolfe: Book of the New Sun Date: Sat, 15-Feb-86 11:29:39 EST Message-ID: <1354 at wucec2.UUCP> Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers References: <194 at analog.UUCP> <3840005 at csd2.UUCP> <651 at edison.UUCP> <1808 at hammer.UUCP> In article <1808 at hammer.UUCP> patcl at hammer.UUCP (Pat Clancy) writes: >>I read Shadow of the Torturer and thought it was horrible. > >I'll second that! This was an outstandingly bad novel. >Yet it seems that every year or so the Wulf-cultists must >issue forth onto the net to demonstrate why there's such >a large and uncritical market for so much bad SF. Oh, for [insert favorite messiah here]'s sake! A little tolerance, PLEASE?!? Whatever your opinion of WOlfE's work (or anyone else's for that matter), it's not that difficult (or doesn't have to be) to understand and admit that someone else's may well be different. I like THE BOOK OF THE NEW SUN. I fully realize that the reasons for which I like it may not apply to you. If they don't, I may question you about it, and ask you to explain your position, but I will do my damnedest NOT to abuse you about it. Can you do me the same courtesy? --pH /* * "And what if I attempt to convince you otherwise?" * "You cannot convince us of anything, Socrates, if we refuse * to listen." */
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net