Digest whorl.v010.n036

Alex David Groce · 17 Oct 1999, 16:31 · from whorl-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce at gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: (whorl) Re: Digest whorl.v010.n036
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:31:02
Message-ID: <whorl-v0010-0125 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0010/0125.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>How do you know that? I think Matthew gets it very wrong, and on purpose. I
>think he totally invents the ties to Zoroastrianism (the Magi) and Osiris
>(the flight to Egypt) for the very understandable reason that he wants to
>emphasize the afterlife (there being no real Jewish connection, and that of
>the Persians and the Egyptians being strong and powerful). There is
>absolutely no evidence for Herod's slaughter of baby boys. Matthew is a
>fabulator, much like Wolfe. The other gospeleers are quite different.

What Nutria and I are saying is that whatever the truth value of "Matthew
invented some stuff" is, it's unlikely that WOLFE thinks he did, which is an
argument for giving THE BOOK OF THE LONG SUN a huge benefit of the doubt as=
 to
whether it matches up with the "real" events (never mind the fact that we'r=
e=20
all discussing events that, of course, are purely fictional--the question is
if the fiction is that "The Book of Silk" tells what really happened to Sil=
k).
Which also brings in the possible notion of other actors than Horn and Nett=
le
in the composition of "The Book of Silk," acting in a Holy Spirit-type role,
although that's more debateable.  Much as Wolfe plays with -coy- narrators =
who
don't tell everything that's going on, I'd be surprised if it turns out that
"The Book of Silk's" version of events doesn't actually match up with what=20
people say in Short Sun--meanings may change, but the events I'll bet stay =
the
same.

Hmm...  The Paul analogy might be really fruitful--isn't Paul's illness=20
mentioned in Galatians sometimes supposed to have been a vision problem or
even the _loss of an eye_?

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu)
Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department
8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net