Digest whorl.v010.n056

Alice Turner · 25 Nov 1999, 10:31 · from whorl-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice Turner" <akt at attglobal.net>
Subject: (whorl) Re: Digest whorl.v010.n056
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 10:31:57
Message-ID: <whorl-v0010-0191 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0010/0191.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The Rodent opined:

> At 08:09 PM 11/16/99 -0500, Slimina of the Green Goo wrote:
> >
> >2. There have been a lot of guesses about "the secret of the inhumi," and
> >the front-runner for a while was that it was simply that they took on (or
> >could take on) aspects of the prey along with the blood; when they
> >encountered a sentient race for the first time, it revolutionized them.
> >Another conjecture has to do with their obviously being able to survive a
> >long time without sustenance in a mummified state. But later thinking is
> >that it's more complicated than that--it's a secret that if known could
> >destroy them--and that Wolfe just hasn't given it to us even in clue form
> >yet.
> >
> >Arguments invited.
>
> It's Rat Time, Slimina!
>
> To begin with, courtesy of Kieran:
>
> Horn: "If only we cared about each other sufficiently. If only all of us
> loved all the others enough, they would go back to [mindless beasts]. We
> would still think them horrible creatures, and they would still be
> dangerous, as the crocodiles in this lower river water are. But they would
> be no worse."
> Evensong: "That is the secret, what you said?"
> Horn: "No, of course not." [p.375]
>
> So, let's invert that. The inhumi take on our characteristics. We are not
> very nice people: enslaving others, raping wimmin, etc. What if we become
> good, "Green Man" types, like the forerunners of Blue? What would the
> inhumi become then? Good guys! Hey, is that why old Quetzal becomes a good
> guy, because of hanging around and being near Silk?
> Inhumi are animals, "underpeople" of Cordo Smith, but of a different sort.
> Their salvation depends on and proceeds from human salvation.
> My guess. It think the clews are there, but I may be taking them wrongly.
>
> Slavering Nutria of the Dripping Jowl

I think you are correct, but that this is not the secret. I also think that
"hanging around and being near" doesn't have much, if anything to do with
it; it's the actual ingestion of blood. The two people we know Q bit had in
common only their youth. Teasel was a young girl and whashisname, Oosik's
son, was probably no more than 18. And he certainly got a gleam in his eye
inspecting those troops of probably mostly teenage girls. But Horn's "No, of
course not!" seems to imply that the actual secret is something else. I also
think that your premise is too straight-forward and goody-goody for Wolfe.

-slimora



*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net