Digest whorl.v010.n093

Bjjp2 · 31 Mar 2000, 19:05 · from whorl-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Bjjp2 at aol.com
Subject: (whorl) Re: Digest whorl.v010.n093
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:05:50 EST
Message-ID: <whorl-v0010-0282 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0010/0282.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 00-03-31 00:31:22 EST, you write:

<< Re my posting on difficulty in even getting started on the Long Sun =3D
 books because of the writing style some months ago in urth.v028.n079 and =
=3D
 replies in n080-n082, I took the advice given and read OBW - and loved =3D
 it.  So then I went back and made myself read all the Long Sun books in =
=3D
 one hit (assisted by mantis' booklets).
=20
 I still think Long Sun is very disappointing.  The third person style of =
=3D
 diction chosen is flat and to my mind rather boring, anaesthetising =3D
 Wolfe's linguistic genius (so on display in OBW and TBNS).  The ideas, =3D
 while interesting, did not require four volumes to present.  As for the =
=3D
 meticulous plotting suggested by Alice Turner, I can only say this was =3D
 not evident to me -  on the contrary I had the impression that unlike =3D
 TBNS the series was not fully written in advance, if only because Exodus =
=3D
 is twice as long as the three preceding volumes.  Nor did much of the =3D
 plotting seem to lead anywhere - to take one random example, what was =3D
 the value of the long (and boring, at least to me) chapter on the visit =
=3D
 to the talus factory in Exodus? >>

I'm a long-time Wolfe fan (and lurker) and I agree with respect to the Long=20
Sun books. I liked the first one, but found subsequent volumes extremely=20
disappointing. I also found much of the series tedious. Do we really need=20
three pages to describe to Silk how a needler works? Seemingly endless=20
discussions while wandering around the tunnels?  Because it's Wolfe, I=20
recognize the distinct possibility that maybe I'm just not smart or=20
perceptive enough to understand the point, but the fact remains that I foun=
d=20
myself skimming pages at times in the Long Sun books.  I agree that the Sho=
rt=20
Sun series is shaping up to be another masterpiece.

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net