Another message from Clute: read it in full!

Nicholas Gevers · 17 Aug 2000, 08:12 · from whorl-v0011.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Nicholas=20Gevers?= <vermoulian at yahoo.com>
Subject: (whorl) Another message from Clute: read it in full!
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:12:58
Message-ID: <whorl-v0011-0120 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0011/0120.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yesterday I relayed the gist of the list's reactions
to the "Clute Revelation" to Clute himself (if in so
doing I misrepresented anyone's viewpoint, I
apologise). Below is what Clute has since written to
me, including his remarks on the points the list has
raised.

--- John Clute wrote:=20

> Dear Nick,
>         Interesting responses, which sort of run the
> gamut of what I think=20
> about the notion, or intuition--rather than
> thought-through=20
> hypothesis--that Horn/Silk may be an inhumu; or
> that, perhaps more=20
> cogently, that Gene Wolfe is allowing us to consider
> the possibility at=20
> this stage of the enterprise.
>         As I'm sure you know, the third volume is
> due out soon; and as I'm=20
> sure you know, Wolfe--unlike his procedure with
> _Long Sun_ --apparently=20
> wrote the whole text before any of it was published:
> so I do live in the=20
> expectation that nothing here is inadvertent, and
> that everything=20
> discovered will, as with _New Sun_ enrich the whole.
>         Comments follow.
> >=20
> > 1) One member agrees with you, and is cross you
> > expressed the idea before he could.
>         ---Sorry about that. To make it worse, you
> might note that I=20
> mentioned the inhumu notion very briefly in my
> earlier review of the first=20
> volume, also in _SFW_ .
>=20
> > 2) Several others are thoughtful, saying they need
> > time to reflect.
>         ---Me too.
>        =20
> > 3) A feminist feels you're engaging in the
> reactionary
> > error of assuming that because someone sympathises
> > with the enemy he must be one of them; in her
> view,
> > Horn is demonstrating the great human virtue of
> > interspecies empathy, not betraying an alien
> identity.
>         ---A bit confused by this, as there are
> several floating=20
> assumptions in here. Unless you were just
> identifying one of the list as a=20
> feminist so I could sort folk out, it doesn't quite
> seem to me that the=20
> issue before us is a feminist issue. But would be
> glad to get a=20
> different take. It may be reactionary to assume that
> if you're not with us=20
> you're with them, but the application of the
> principle here presupposes=20
> the inhumi as enemy, a notion I'm very leary of at
> this stage. I would go=20
> so far as to suggest that Horn/Silk (whoever they
> are) is more concerned=20
> with family than species; and that the book is
> expanding, as are=20
> Horn/Silk's Assumptions of different forms, through
> an expansion of the=20
> idea of family.=20
>=20
> > 4) Most criticism of your hypothesis rests on
> textual
> > details: if Horn is an inhumu, why doesn't Oreb
> > perceive this? If Horn is an inhumu, how can he
> write
> > his text with such facility, whereas inhumi in
> general
> > can hardly write at all? When is the transition
> from
> > human to inhumu supposed to have occurred? If Horn
> is
> > capable of shapeshifting, why doesn't he do away
> with
> > his injuries such as his missing eye? And so it
> goes.
>         ---All good points, it strikes me (see
> comment after next=20
> paragraph). The question here about when he might
> have changed is the=20
> question I asked: when did he begin to find it
> difficult to eat human=20
> food? Chronology is so complex in the text that I
> could not begin to give=20
> an answer to this on the basis of one reading--or,
> for that matter, work=20
> it out to my satisfaction that this is an irrelevant
> track to follow.
> =20
> > Basically, the Whorl list has been agreeing for
> the
> > last nine months that Horn is the (human) redeemer
> of
> > the humans of the three whorls, and that "the
> secret
> > of the inhumi", which Horn is sworn to protect,
> > relates somehow to that redemption: if humans
> achieve
> > goodness in themselves, the inhumi preying on them
> > will imbibe and emulate that goodness.
>         ---I'd be very disappointed if this were the
> case: by which I mean=20
> I'd be disappointed if this were the "secret of the
> inhumi" which=20
> we have as far as I know not yet been told--because
> 1) although the idea=20
> seems transparently and conspicuously true 2) WE
> ALREADY KNOW IT.=20
> _In Green's Jungles_ (I haven't chapter and verse
> here) seems to make it=20
> extremely clear that inhumi take on the
> characteristics of those they=20
> change into (as it were) as part of the process of
> feeding on them.=20
>         The idea that the achievement of human
> goodness (which would=20
> similarly transform the inhumi) seems to me, though
> very likely to be the=20
> case, not to be an inhumi secret at all.=20
>          My intuition about Horn/Silk is inchoate
> and absolutely not=20
> defended by me unto death, unlike the way I got
> addicted, nearly 20 years=20
> ago now, to the idea that Severian's mother was in
> fact the Autarch. (It=20
> took a long time to lose the sweet-tooth of that
> particular notion.)
>         My intuition is based on a sense that
> somehow or other Horn/Silk's=20
> nature-as-inhumu (if it is confirmed to be a fair
> take) is intrinsicate=20
> with his relationship to the Neighbors, or
> whoever/whatever represents=20
> them to him, inhumi (those inhumi who took on
> Neighborly nature) or ghost=20
> or aquastors in the Corridors of Time or what. And
> that Horn/Silk as=20
> inhumu as Neighbor might well "fool" Oreb, etc, etc.
>
>=20
> Best,
> John=20
>=20


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net