Urth Net

← back to the conversation

RTTW spoilers, the main narrator

Spectacled Bear · 16 Feb 2001, 18:15 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Spectacled Bear <spectacled.bear at pobox.com>
Subject: Re: (whorl) RTTW spoilers, the main narrator
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:15:24 +0000
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0252 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0252.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 10:54 2001-02-16 -0600, Adam Stephanides wrote:
>on 2/13/01 8:56 PM, Michael Andre-Driussi at mantis at sirius.com wrote:
>
>> IIRC, as Horn lay dying in the lander on Green, the deal expressed by the
>> Neighbors was something like: from two broken men we will make one whole
>> man.  And since Horn's "broken" nature was a dead body, well, it seemed =
as
>> if the broken part of Silk was something different, for example, a
>> spirit/soul that was seeking oblivion.  So if this is true, then Horn's
>> healthy spirit is poured into Silk's healthy body (which also just happe=
ns
>> to be on the Whorl, where Horn had been trying to go).
>=20
>I agree with all of this; in fact, the Neighbor says he will send Horn's
>spirit "into someone whose own spirit is dying."  I think that this means
>just what you say above: that Silk's spirit was seeking oblivion, not that
>it was on its way out of Silk's body.
>
>> To turn your question around: if, as you seem to be saying, Silk's spirit
>> =3Dwas=3D already in Silk's body, and Horn's spirit is in there, too
>
>Right

Yes. Why do we need all the stuff about the fragment in Pig?
I didn't see any evidence for it in the text, and it simply
seems unnecessary. Adam makes a far better case against it
than I could have assembled - thanks, Adam!

Spectacled Bear.


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the=20
MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net