Horn ain't dead

Adam Stephanides · 25 Feb 2001, 20:59 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: (whorl) Horn ain't dead
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:59:23
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0349 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0349.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

alga wrote:

>It seems more and more repetitive to say so, but you just can't ignore
>the computer model that GW has been enamoured with from the start of LS.
[snip]
>So I will argue
>for the Horn Lives viewpoint--quite vehemently, actually. You could say
>that Horn's spirit was a very successful virus taking over the Silk
>functional operating system (body). Or some other metaphor. But it seems
>to me completely clear that whoever this person thinks he is at the end
>of the book, Horn is *still there*. He will not, cannot, be erased from
>the system completely.

It's not clear to me why you regard the computer model as conclusive
evidence that Horn lives.  It's quite possible to completely purge an
invading virus (or operating system, or whatever) from a computer it's
infected.

> It might be like Sev being able to access Thecla
>or the Autarch or whomever. Or not. Somewhere in LS there is an
>explanation of how, after a god has possessed someone, the god is never
>completely erased, and this is similar.

While it's not a direct refutation of your point, I don't believe that the
Silk-Horn situation is equivalent to possession or to the Severian-Thecla
situation (or to the Windows-Linux metaphor you used later).  There's no
evidence that two separate personalities coexist in Silk's body which can
manifest themselves independently.  Rather, what seems to be going on is
that Silk and Horn's personalities have merged into the single entity I, and
others, have been calling Silkhorn.

As to your main point, I think we should draw a distinction between memory
and spirit (simplifying Dan'l's excellent post).  I am quite willing to
accept that Silk retains Horn's memories, although I there's no direct
evidence for this.   But as for spirit, while I am far from having a clear
understanding of what's going on, I am going to take the appearance of
Silkhorn's astral body as a definitive indicator, unless somebody has a
better alternative.  And, going by that, Horn's spirit does depart at some
point before the astral trip to "bring Scylla home."

--Adam

=20

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net