Urth Net

← back to the conversation

women, memory, and stuff

James Jordan · 27 Feb 2001, 08:58 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at home.com>
Subject: Re: (whorl) women, memory, and stuff
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:58:55
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0375 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0375.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 05:16 AM 2/27/2001 -0800, you wrote:

>Mr. Groce wondered why Nettle returned to Whorl, what
>with her wife-and-mother duties being over.  Well,
>unWolfeish as it sounds, maybe it was to pursue her
>career!  As a writer and editor, she sure beats either
>Horn or, apparently, Silk.  The Book of Nettle, set
>during and after the upcoming voyage-that could be
>pretty neat.  And an awfully big change for Wolfe, not
>known for overwhelming compassion towards female
>characters.  Maybe he finds it more acceptable for
>women to "find themselves" after they have worked off
>their Original Sin Duties.  (Sorry, that wasn't nice,
>but I don't think it was unwarranted.)  I found the
>contrasts in his treatment of women throughout LS and
>SS very odd, (especially Chenille and Mucor) so maybe
>he was experimenting to a purpose.  OK, maybe not...;)

         We've discussed this on Urth a while back, as I recall. I think=20
the consensus was that Wolfe is about as mean to his male characters as to=20
his female ones, on balance. As for Original Sin, remember that "In Adam's=20
fall we sinn-ed all." Yes, Eve bit the "appil" first, but it was Adam's=20
fault mainly. The notion that the woman led the man into sin part of=20
low-level superstition, found here and there to be sure, but Wolfe is way=20
too knowledgeable for that kind of stuff. The New Testament is clear that=20
it was Adam's doing, and that the woman was tricked, while the man acted=20
with full knowledge of what he was doing. The reason for this goes back to=20
Genesis 2, where Adam was told not to eat the fruit before Eve was made.=20
Thus, Adam had first-hand knowledge of the prohibition, while Eve's was=20
second-hand. There's more, but that's enough.

Pat. Nut.


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net