Heresy

William Ansley · 28 Feb 2001, 00:38 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: William Ansley <wansley at warwick.net>
Subject: Re: (whorl) Heresy
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:38:49
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0391 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0391.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>I strongly suspect that the inability to reach a consensus is *because*
>of the very smart scholars here, not despite it. There's too much
>invention and over-interpretation going on in those fertile brains,
>and the straightforward interpretation is lost among the possibilies.
>It's like quiz programs, where most people can answer questions like
>"which species of white bear roams the unspoiled wastes of ..." because
>they have only ever heard of one kind of bear being white. Bear experts
>are less certain because they know black bears can be white, even without
>being albino.
>
>Spectacled Bear.
>
>"...it represents for me all that monomaniacal fabric of argument, so
>tightly woven that not even the tiniest objection or spark of light can
>escape its net, in which human minds become enmeshed whenever the
>subject is one in which no appeal to fact is possible" - _Sword_, Ch. 38

So, we're too darn smart for our own good, are we? Maybe.

But, I think the very smart, scholarly and fertile brain of Gene=20
Wolfe is as much responsible for the lack of straightforward=20
interpretation of his works as our collective brilliance.

I would like to see a straightforward interpretation of any of Gene=20
Wolfe's novel or novella length works, or even some of his short=20
stories. (Well, perhaps there are a few...)

But, Mr. Bear, you did come up with the perfect Wolfe quote to=20
illustrate your point. Bravo!

William Ansley

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net