Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Authorship of RTTW third-person sections (spoilers)

James Jordan · 06 Mar 2001, 08:55 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: James Jordan <jbjordan4 at home.com>
Subject: Re: (whorl) Authorship of RTTW third-person sections (spoilers)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:55:43
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0408 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0408.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

As long as we're on this topic, I personally found the revelation that Horn=20
had written the LS books, and that the children had written the 3rd person=20
parts of RTW, annoying. Wolfe has done this kind of "switchback" (or=20
whatever you call it) in many short stories, so that at the end we learn=20
that things are not what they have seemed and are impelled to re-read the=20
story (if we want to). Well, that's okay for a short story, but IMHO not=20
for a 1000+ page narrative. It feels to me like a stunt, and little more;=20
and to me it diminishes the narrative. It's not as if we have any "Real=20
Silk" to measure "Horn's Silk" by. Re-reading the narrative is not going to=20
get us any more than we already have, unless we get some kind of kick out=20
of trying to figure out how Horn and Nettle came by each bit of=20
information. And, as Adam and I have both pointed out, the children's parts=20
of RTW just read like plain old Wolfe, and that is not credible.
	Well, Wolfe has always done this kind of thing. It's clever in short=20
pieces, but I find it very annoying and rather pretentious in these long=20
narratives. But to each her/his own, I guess.

Patera Nutria


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net