Babbie's 20-20-20-20 vision
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 13 Mar 2001, 08:29
· from whorl-v0012.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com> Subject: RE: (whorl) Babbie's 20-20-20-20 vision Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:29:24 Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0446 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0446.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Further Borskianism: > How do you interpret the scene on dream-Urth that Hoof describes > as following: > > "Our boat was water, and Babbie was a hairy man with thick arms > and real big shoulders, and glasses, and a couple of Babbie's > eyes (the little ones)." ... > Will I now be damned if I theorize that Babbie has at least > tetra-ocular vision--half of which apparently needs correction > by spectacles? You aren't even damned for thinking the Neighbors have two heads,=20 or seven if it makes you happy; just wrong (or at best=20 unsubstantiated). But you are quite right about Babbie (and thus=20 presumably other Bluvian critters, including the Neighbors)=20 having four eyes. This fits the general theme -- elephants with=20 eight legs & two trunks, etc.=20 (BTW, I noticed the two trunks long before I picked up the octopedality, and had a rather nightmarish flashback to FOOTFALL,=20 the last book by either Niven or Pournelle I bothered even=20 trying to read. Niven shot his wad as a writer long ago; and=20 Pournelle never had one.) Again: I can't offer direct evidence that Neighbors, Hus,=20 octodiles, etc., _don't_ have two heads apiece; I have only=20 my argument that, if they do, one head does not constitute the "person" in the same way that Typhon's transplanted head=20 "is" Typhon. [H'mmmmm. PiaTyphon, I think, has to be added to my list of=20 bleshed people in the SUN books. This "theme" looks bigger every time I look at it. One thing for sure about Typhon and Piaton: it wasn't syzygy...] > (Note also how Hoof describes Horn as looking more like > the father he remembers from Blue.) Thanks for reminding me of this. There was _something_ that bothered me about Hoof-and-Hide's decision that Silkhorn is not their father: this scene is what was niggling in the back of my head. You'd think he'd (or they'd) have more of a clue that, yep, Dad's in there. --Blattid *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun. *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/ *To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com *If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.= com
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net