Denial as a Literary Structure
Patrick O'Leary · 20 Apr 2001, 11:17
· from whorl-v0012.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Patrick O'Leary" <poleary at cecom.com> Subject: (whorl) Re:Denial as a Literary Structure Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:17:50 Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0667 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0667.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam wrote: --------------- MESSAGE whorl.v012.n107.9 --------------- From: Adam Stephanides <adamsteph at earthlink.net> Subject: "Dangling" plot threads >>So, if I'm correct, TBOTSS takes its place with PEACE as a radical experiment with narrative: in this case, a psychological drama which must be largely inferred from what the narrator leaves out.>> A stunning post, that may provide a clue to the various vaguely unsatisfied reactions that several here have expressed about RTTW : "muddled", "hurried= ," "Senile" "Sloppy." I think this may have something to do with its difficul= t and frustrating narrative structure. While we shouldn't worship of the text, (Torah, Torah, Torah) I think we ha= ve to give Wolfe the benefit of a doubt. (In my considered opinion the man does not make aesthetic mistakes. He makes philosophical/ narrative choices which we may or may not agree with, may or may not like, may or may= not be moved by. And, of course, he makes typos. Errors of a different order.) I agree with Adam because what's most striking to me about RTTW (and a grea= t deal of Wolfe) is what is missing. I muse at length about this defining literary tactic in= my essay on Wolfe "If Ever A Wiz There Was" which appears in my latest book: OTHER VOICES, OT= HER DOORS. I think it may be important to ask: "What is missing from the text of the s= hort sun books?" Here are, to me, some provocative missing scenes. There must be more. Silk/Horn's conversation with Chenille. Silk/Horn's final confrontation with Sinew. Silk/Horn's reunion talk with Nettle. Most of Silk/Horn's adventures of Green. Hyacinth's death. As Adam said, each of these imply a level of psychic torment that cannot be borne by the narrator. So we have a story founded on a search for Hero/Saint by a very human man, who becomes the Hero/Saint he sought. The story is told after his transformation. He spends the bulk of the narra= tive oddly, in denial and guilt. Haunted by his new identity and his old sins--H= is failure. He is Horn denying his is Silk. But, finally, we discover that he is Silk denying he is Silk. What we take to be a story of a sinner who has reincarnated a Saint and cannot bear the contrast between his soul's knowledge of goodness and his failure to live up to that model--is actually a sleight of hand, a narrative trick , a portrait of denial. The Short Sun books (it occurs to me that Horn is Silk's "Shorter Son") are actually the story of a Saint who is tormented by Sin, running from his mission, denying his vocation, fleeing his Sainthood, who finally accepts h= is sinful nature, who embraces his humanity. Horn saves Silk. Just some thoughts. Patrick O'leary *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun. *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/ *To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com *If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.= com
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net