Destroying Inhumi

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 26 Apr 2001, 09:05 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (whorl) Destroying Inhumi
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:05:16
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0739 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0739.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

PatNutRit:

> The Secret, it seems, is a weapon that can destroy the inhumi,

No, no, a _thousand_ times no! Horn says clearly that it will not,
that it will reduce them to mindless beasts. (Of course, you might
consider that a form of "destruction.") So far, "love each other"
is the _only_ suggestion that has any plausible hope of doing this.

> Practically, such blood could be deposited in blood banks,
> analogous to Christ's deposit of His blood in the Eucharist.

Not the Catholic (& therefore Lupine) understanding of the=20
Eucharist. In the Eucharist, the Sacrifice of the Messiah is
-- not reenacted, but made present, in a sense which transcends
time and space: thus, the blood which the wine becomes is not
blood "deposited" in some mystical blood bank, but actually bled
at that (eternal, universal, non-temporal) moment. This is, btw,
analogous to the original Passover, in which the message is "God
did so-and-so for us" -- not "for our ancestors," but "for us";
in eating the Passover, a Jew of this day and age is mystically
present at the original Exodus. All the People of Israel are=20
present at Sinai.

A somewhat subtler objection is "if the secret will reduce
the inhumi to mindless beasts, the Love One Another hypothesis
won't work _because_ humans will voluntarily give their blood
to the inhumi." Ahhh, but the inhumi to whom they give their
blood become human (at least in spirit); so the only pure inhumi=20
are, precisely, the mindless beasts. This, of course, is true=20
even as Horn speaks: Krait, Jahlee, Fava, etc., are in fact human=20
in spirit. But they represent danger _because_ the kind of human
they have become is not a being of Agape; and the "weapon" is=20
"too heavy to weild" _because_ humans, _not_ loving each other,
will not voluntarily give their blood to the inhumi anyway. It
is "too heavy to weild:" it is not practical (in the Fallen World,
in which Blue, Green, Urth, and the _Whorl_ all inhere) to suppose
that humans will as-a-race become Agape-driven, and so they cannot
even lift the "sword" that would destroy the inhumi _as a threat_.

> This has not satisfied because transforming the inhumi does not
> seem to be a weapon to destroy them. But is this the right
> understanding? SS is clearly a religious as well as a political
> and personal novel. Twice we have eucharistic scenes.=20

Right -- the "agape feast" is brought into extreme foreground.

> That's no accident: In Christian thought the Eucharist is eating
> and drinking Christ's death into oneself, so that one can die to
> one's own evil and be born anew, over and over again.=20

Clearly you're not of the "once for all" persuasion. ;*)

My own understanding is a bit different from the "over and over
again" you cite here -- Catholicism, as I understand it, teaches
not that the Eucharist is rebirth (that happens at Baptism), but
of the process by which we are gradually sanctified, con-formed
to the Image of Christ. By analogy, repeated feeding from=20
Agapistic humans would gradually sanctify the inhumi, and con-form
them to Agape.

> I suggest that to transform the inhumi into true humans is
> precisely to destroy inhumi, to destroy what makes them IN-humi.
> Pay close attention to the name Wolfe has given them: We humans
> are usually inhumi, unless we "die" in Christ and are "raised"
> to a new life.

Ummmm. I _think_ the root of the word is not "human (ex _homo_)"=20
but "humus." The prefix "in" is ambiguous, and can mean "not" or
simply "in." Thus, the inhumi are "not-Earthly," and, at the same
time, thay are the "in-Earth," the Buried, in at least the sense
of "hidden," but becoming horrifically literal in the marketplace=20
of Gaon.

> In short, I suspect that destroying the inhumi has a religious
> meaning, not a military one.

There we are in complete agreement 8*)

Blat, blat,

--Blattid/Dan'l

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net