Urth Net

← back to the conversation

A Mania for Conversations

Steve Strickland · 10 Jun 2001, 15:53 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Steve Strickland" <SSTRICKLAND at satx.rr.com>
Subject: Re: (whorl) A Mania for Conversations
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:53:06
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0807 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0807.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I took Horn's statement as a bit of self-deprecating humor on the part of
Mr. Wolfe.  No doubt as a result of the extensive narrative sections in the
latter volumes of Long Sun, Wolfe received more than a few comments like,
"Can't you write anything but dialogue?" or "Can't you pepper the dialogue
with a little more description?" (And I'm sure he received less critical
observations regarding the same.)

As I see it, Horn's statement is Wolfe's playful nod to the critics (while
playfully placing the blame on the narrator-character, Horn.)

Very cute.

Imperator

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Straight" <straight at email.unc.edu>
To: <whorl at lists1.ba.best.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: (whorl) A Mania for Conversations


>
> Horn's statement about having a mania for recording coversations struck me
> as a key insight into Wolfe's writing.  Could it be that Wolfe's eliptical
> style is largely based on a preference for writing conversations rather
> than describing actions?  I'd have to do some more reading with this idea
> in mind, but I have the impression that quite a lot of the gaps in Wolfe's
> narratives come when a conversation is interrupted by some event, and we
> skip the event for another conversation in which someone may or may not
> describe or allude to the event itself.
>
> -Rostrum
>
>
> *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
> *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
> *To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
ranjit at moonmilk.com
> *If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list:
urth at lists.best.com
>


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net