Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Fallible Narrators and Even More Fallible Copyists: a

Michael Straight · 11 Jun 2001, 15:43 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Michael Straight <straight at email.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: (whorl) Fallible Narrators and Even More Fallible Copyists: a
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:43:40
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0825 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0825.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Alex David Groce wrote:

> Blish was Catholic?  Somehow I'd gotten the impression he was, at some
> point, an atheist and at another point (I forget the ordering) an
> Anglican, and that heresies and theology were to a large extent more a
> hobby to him than a matter of faith.  Was I off-base?  Google doesn't
> quickly confirm either hypothesis for me.

You're right.  Blish was not Catholic and I don't think he did a very good
job capturing Catholic thinking in Case of Conscience.  I seem to remember
him saying that in the book's universe the Church had only recently
accepted Darwinism, when in real life the Church has never really opposed
it.

But the real oddity is the book's central dilemma (SPOILERS ahead!).  I
was completely unable to believe that a Jesuit would assume that because
they'd discovered aliens with no discernible knowledge of God or sin, that
the whole planet must be an illusion created by Satan.  Since when do
Catholics believe Satan is capable of such a thing?  I think there's some
fringe fundamentalists who have suggested the fossil record is some kind
of trick by Satan, but Jesuits?  And it's extremely anthropocentric to
assume that just because we don't understand how this race is related to
God they can only be some sort of delusion by Satan to trick us.  The
whole thing just rang completely false to me.

-Rostrum


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net