Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Fan fic? Fooey.

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 19 Jun 2001, 11:22 · from whorl-v0012.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <ddanehy at siebel.com>
Subject: RE: (whorl) Fan fic? Fooey.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:22:27
Message-ID: <whorl-v0012-0856 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0012/0856.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Responding to my use of the term "parasitic," his=20
Wombattitude wrote:

> Not that we're loading up with judgmental terms here, no, no.

No, no. I meant the word in a strictly technical sense;
the existence of fanfic is completely dependent on, and
draws its energy from, the primary creator of the fictional
world. (Or would that be "secondary creator," since the
fictional world is, by definition, a secondary creation?
In which case the fanfic writer is a tertiary creator,=20
and...)


> >MaryJane.
> "Mary Sue".

Right. Mary Janes are those shoes. Guess who doesn't read
much fanfic? (Though I wrote some, and even got paid for
it, a very long time ago. It was very bad indeed.)

In my defense, I was careful to say "usually (but not=20
always) quite _bad_." I know that good fanfic exists;
I'm just not intrepid enough to wade through the jungles
of sludge and dig out the good stuff.

An interesting side note: Are franchise novels fanfic?
Ever? Is "fanfic" a boolean or a fuzzy term?  One can
see a kind of spectrum running from purest fanfic; to=20
things like the "Best of Trek" anthologies; to the more
blatantly fannish Trek novels (i.e., "Spock, Messiah");
to the professionally franchised books; to "authorized
continuations" like the Anderson/B.Herbert DUNE books
and the "New Foundation Trilogy"; to hommage and parody;
to "heavily influenced," and finally ending with "pure"=20
creation (which is _never_ pure).

--Blattid


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net