Blue = Urth, didn't Wolfe say it wasn't?

Christopher R. Culver · 09 Jan 2002, 05:24 · from whorl-v0013.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Christopher R. Culver" <christopherculver at hotmail.com>
Subject: Blue = Urth, didn't Wolfe say it wasn't?
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 06:24:16 +0100
Message-ID: <whorl-v0013-whorl.v012.n185.4 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0013/whorl.v012.n185.4.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

With all the talk of the ol' "Blue is Urth, Green is Lune" hypothesis,
am I the only one who has a foggy recollection that Gene Wolfe expressly
denied this in an interview just before the release of ON BLUE'S WATERS?

Christopher Culver

------------------------------------------------------------
CHRISTOPHER R. CULVER
TEJO-volontulo en la Centra Oficejo de UEA kaj TEJO
Retposxto privata: christopherculver at hotmail.com
PGP-sxlosilo havebla de la servilo aux per peti de mi
"Felicxaj estas tiuj kiuj malsatas kaj soifas por justeco, cxar ili
estos satigitaj."
- Skt. Mateo 5:6
------------------------------------------------------------

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net