Smith & Vance

m.driussi · 18 Mar 1997, 03:32 · from whorl-v0004.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: m.driussi at genie.com
Subject: (whorl) Smith & Vance
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 97 03:32:00 GMT
Message-ID: <whorl-v0004-0250 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0004/0250.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Posted from Whorl, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun]

Reply:  Item #4788907 from WHORL at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET00#

Nutria,

OTOH we know (from interviews as well as Wolfe-written articles) that Gene
Wolfe read and deeply admired Jack Vance's THE DYING EARTH.  And most
readers, I think, will sense a certain similarity in writing styles
between Vance and Wolfe: high style, macabre humor, cultural
anthropology, etc.

Yet (and maybe this is just me, I don't know) Wolfe's work in spirit
and in tone is actually much closer to Cordwainer Smith's work than
it is to Vance's.  Part of this is probably [hedgeword] due to the
fact that nearly all of the time [hedge] Vance is lambasting Religion
as a controlling tool used by the dominant minority over the gullible
population.  Vance belongs to a tradition of anti-religion genre
writers going back to Edgar Rice Burroughs and before.  (He is also a
satirist of the arbitrary conventions found in every society.)

So the paradox: TBOTNS is said to be (and understood to be) a
descendant of Vance's THE DYING EARTH (and Clark Ashton Smith's
"Zothique," but I don't want to argue about that at the moment <g>),
yet in reality TBOTNS is more like Cordwainer Smith's work, =3Deven
though=3D nobody is claiming that Wolfe ever read such.

(Personally I see a lot of difference between Herbert's work and
Cordwainer Smith's work: in soundbyte terms, because Herbert is
working out Machiavellian themes and Smith is working out Christian
themes.  [Now, I am aware that there is a reading of DUNE that sees it
as a wonderful affirmation of Islam--not to detract from those who
believe this, still I remain sceptical, due to the Machiavellian
focus of much of Herbert's work.])

=3Dmantis=3D

Questions or problems to whorl-owner at lists.best.com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net