Sacrifice Mechanics
Joel Priddy · 09 May 1997, 14:00
· from whorl-v0005.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Joel Priddy <jpriddy at saturn.vcu.edu> Subject: (whorl) Sacrifice Mechanics Date: Fri, 9 May 97 10:00:19 EDT Message-ID: <whorl-v0005-0251 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0005/0251.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun] Here's another a idea that I'm throwing out to you without bothering to check the text (I really need to buy copies of the books if I'm going to keep this up, huh?): there's been some discussion as to what happens on a "mechanical" level during a sacrifice that gets the gods attention. If I recall correctly, even when the gods aren't sending theophanies, the augurs are able to make predictions from the entrails of the victims, and these can be packed with very specific detail. I think it's at the funeral where Silk basically reads the plotline of the book from a pile of guts. Is there any way this could be accounted for in a "mechanical" sense? Maybe if the gods are exerting tremndous active control on the genetic structure of the Whorl's animal population, and then hypnotizing people to purchase the animal with the right message in it, but if they had that much control, the book would never have happened. So here's the thought... The Gods of Mainframe are real gods. Wolfe has stated his theory that the pagan gods were real, just not worthy of worship. Perhaps this is an illustration of that. I admit, I hope some one shoots this down quickly and succinctly. I'd much rather keep the gods on a technological scale where we can at least discuss them. If they've attained a supernatural quality (as a result of worship and sacrifice?) then they become just too unkown. But is there a way to account for both the hunger for sacrifices and the accuracy of augury? Hrm... I suppose a real theophany did follow the above mentioned sacrifice, so who knows what sorts of mental activity was being broadcast in that instance. Are there other instances of very specifically accurate divinations? JOEL
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net