Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Hy-napping

Alice K. Turner · 31 Jul 1997, 19:32 · from whorl-v0007.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Alice K. Turner" <al at interport.net>
Subject: (whorl) Hy-napping
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 19:32:27
Message-ID: <whorl-v0007-0532 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0532.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


[Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun]

> Gene Wolfe responded to Q. 22 as follows:
>
> 22.  "Why did Auk . . . kidnap Hyacinth, and why . . . did he let her
> go?"  Because Tartaros had told him to bring a woman.  He released
> her as he recovered from his brain injury, was able to think more
> clearly, and realized that Hyacinth was not the woman he should
> bring.  (Putting it another way, he released her because Tartaros
> told him to.  These answers are not as disparate as they may appear.)
>
> Now, as I recall, Tartaros' command included something like "..a woman
> is
> crucial, this is not". Just musing aloud, but is this because Tartaros
> is
> already gathering the potential colonists and is mindful of the fact
> that a
> viable colony needs women to bear children? Is the apparent reference
> to
> [brain injury=3DTartaros] equivalent to Dr. Crane's [Outsider
> enlightenment=3DSilk's anuerism] ?

lasrach, the simple answer to your question, I think, is "yes." But this
was my question originally, and I think Wolfe's answer is somewhat
disingenuous. Consider: Tartaros has been at Auk's side for quite a
while, stays with him while Hy is imprisoned for the better part of a
week (mantis can supply time-line), while food is brought for her
etc.---it sure as hell wouldn't take that long to realize that she's the
wrong woman. No, I fear the real answer is that the novelist needed her
off-stage to give Silk some freedom of movement, and that he didn't
construct an alibi for himself as neatly as he usually does. Though it
would have been fairly easy--a sighting of or even an adroit reference
to Chenille could have done it.

> Also, I can't admit to being too happy that the explanation of the
> motivation of one of the central characters, Quetzal, remains beyond
> the
> scope of the Long Sun books. Tune in next year, when the foul plans of
> the
> malignant inhumi become..........less opaque.

Agreed. If -Long Sun- is taken as an self-contained entity, it truly
isn't fair to the reader. But I guess we, this group in particular,
can't take it that way.

-alga-






An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net