Hy-napping
Alice K. Turner · 31 Jul 1997, 19:32
· from whorl-v0007.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: "Alice K. Turner" <al at interport.net> Subject: (whorl) Hy-napping Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 19:32:27 Message-ID: <whorl-v0007-0532 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0532.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun] > Gene Wolfe responded to Q. 22 as follows: > > 22. "Why did Auk . . . kidnap Hyacinth, and why . . . did he let her > go?" Because Tartaros had told him to bring a woman. He released > her as he recovered from his brain injury, was able to think more > clearly, and realized that Hyacinth was not the woman he should > bring. (Putting it another way, he released her because Tartaros > told him to. These answers are not as disparate as they may appear.) > > Now, as I recall, Tartaros' command included something like "..a woman > is > crucial, this is not". Just musing aloud, but is this because Tartaros > is > already gathering the potential colonists and is mindful of the fact > that a > viable colony needs women to bear children? Is the apparent reference > to > [brain injury=3DTartaros] equivalent to Dr. Crane's [Outsider > enlightenment=3DSilk's anuerism] ? lasrach, the simple answer to your question, I think, is "yes." But this was my question originally, and I think Wolfe's answer is somewhat disingenuous. Consider: Tartaros has been at Auk's side for quite a while, stays with him while Hy is imprisoned for the better part of a week (mantis can supply time-line), while food is brought for her etc.---it sure as hell wouldn't take that long to realize that she's the wrong woman. No, I fear the real answer is that the novelist needed her off-stage to give Silk some freedom of movement, and that he didn't construct an alibi for himself as neatly as he usually does. Though it would have been fairly easy--a sighting of or even an adroit reference to Chenille could have done it. > Also, I can't admit to being too happy that the explanation of the > motivation of one of the central characters, Quetzal, remains beyond > the > scope of the Long Sun books. Tune in next year, when the foul plans of > the > malignant inhumi become..........less opaque. Agreed. If -Long Sun- is taken as an self-contained entity, it truly isn't fair to the reader. But I guess we, this group in particular, can't take it that way. -alga-
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net