Digest whorl.v007.n018

Michael Straight · 04 Sep 1997, 09:54 · from whorl-v0007.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: straight at email.unc.edu (Michael Straight)
Subject: Re: (whorl) Re: Digest whorl.v007.n018
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 09:54:50  (Eastern Daylight Time)
Message-ID: <whorl-v0007-0553 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0553.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun]

-- Begin original message --

Alga quoted and then wrote:
> > of Wolfe's answer indicate that he seemed somewhat saddened by the fact
> > that people felt they had to ask him; I sometimes suspect that Wolfe is
> > upset by the degree to which we the readers attribute to him both
> > infalibility and infinite cleverness. Generally, there are answers to a=
ny
> > question we might have, and we just have to ask the text correctly.
>=20
> I'm a little confused by this. Why should he be saddened? He writes puzzle
> stories; we, the readers who like them (not a majority of the reading
> public) puzzle them out and he should love the effort we put in. As an
> author and a professional editor (I am also a professional editor and I
> have some idea of what this entails), he was and is certainly knowledgeab=
le
> about the author's responsibility in how stories succeed in getting throu=
gh
> to readers. If he seemed saddened at how we +failed+ (especially of a gro=
up
> like this), it seems a bit arrogant to me; it means that he was unclear or
> too cryptic or that his editor was too distracted to straighten things ou=
t.

First of all, I'm not sure I'd agree with the description of Wolfe's works =
as
"puzzle stories."  My impression is that Wolfe is just trying to tell stori=
es
in which many of the things that happen are told in a subtle way, and that =
his=20
aim is that a careful reader could catch most of what's going on.

His "sadness" is probably like when you make a comment or a subtle joke and=
 no=20
one gets it.  It's a fine line, you want people to get your jokes, but the =
more
subtle you can be and still have people get it, the more fun it is. =20

And then some of the people you know start saying "Oh! She's being SUBTLE!"=20
and proceed to find all these "hidden meanings" in everything you say. =20

I'm the first to admit that I've missed major points of some of Wolfe's wor=
ks
that were obvious once they were pointed out, but on the other hand, I feel
like some of the discussion on this list is streching things way beyond what
Wolfe was trying to do.  That's not to say it isn't fun or that there might=20
be interesting connections that he wasn't even aware of, but I can see how =
it
would be frustrating for Wolfe both to find that something he thought was c=
lear
turns out to have been too obscure for many readers and also to find people=20
fixating on details that he didn't mean to attach much significance to.

Frankly, considering how many people would love to be able to write half as=20
well as Wolfe, I have little sympathy for him.  :-)

-Rostrum

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net