Rostum & Nutria
Jim Jordan · 08 Sep 1997, 16:09
· from whorl-v0007.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: Jim Jordan <jbjordan at gnt.net> Subject: Re: (whorl) Rostum & Nutria Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 16:09:01 Message-ID: <whorl-v0007-0563 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0563.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun] At 07:22 PM 9/8/97 GMT, you wrote: > >[Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun] > >Reply: Item #7943197 from WHORL at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET00# > >Gentlemen! > >I don't want to sound alarmed, but I think you are both needlessly >painting yourselves into antagonistic corners. > >To whit: Nutria writes "[Wolfe] has to come on-line and tell us >point-blank: the Outsider is God!" > >Well no, he doesn't =3Dhave=3D to, unless I've missed something (and I >admit freely that I might have); he didn't even bring it up himself, >it was the question(s) posed by others that he answered.=20 Well, I asked the question, and only because there was so much debate about it right here! I'm not trying to be antagonistic. I was only pointing out that some of the clues in Wolfe are found in Christianity and the Bible, two sources that many modern readers are strikingly unfamiliar with; or with which they are only marginally familiar, with the result that they miss important clues and chase rabbits.=20 If you don't know the history of philosophy, you will miss some of the cute things in Asimov's *I, Robot.* Asimov might have been disappointed in readers who missed such things, regarding the history of philosophy as something people should generally know. That was my only point. Now, "Wolfe is not trying to convert anybody." Hmmm. Well, that's going to depend on what you mean by "convert." In "The Detective of Dreams," a stealthy invasion of the gospel is presented as the corrective to tyranny. I think that's pretty much what is going on in both the Severian and Silk narratives also, and elsewhere. Sure, that's just how Wolfe looks at things. But, when a Christian communicates his ideas and worldview, that CAN be called "evangelism" in some broad sense, no? Tyranny (statism), idolatry, and Christianity are major themes and concerns in most of Wolfe's serious work. But of course, he is not writing tracts, any more than Shakespeare was writing tracts when he wrote plays to try and teach England's rulers how to rule. Just some grist for your mill. Unantagonistically, Nutria
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net