Cordwainer Smith reading order -- dissent

David_Lebling · 12 Sep 1997, 09:18 · from whorl-v0007.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: David_Lebling at avid.com
Subject: (whorl) Cordwainer Smith reading order -- dissent
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 97 09:18:49
Message-ID: <whorl-v0007-0587 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0007/0587.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Posted from WHORL, the mailing list for Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun]

Rostrum, Nutria, alga, et al.,

I'd have to disagree slightly with the Rodent of Unusual Size.

Don't read Smith in the chronological order set out in the NESFA books
(but do buy them -- run, do not walk!).

Read "The Ballad of Lost C'mell," then "Scanners Live in Vain," then
"The Game of Rat and Dragon."  After that, I would move on to "Alpha
Ralpha Boulevard" and eventually "Norstrilia."  Read "On the ... Planet"
(really a novel in three episodes) last.  Read the very early stuff and
the very late stuff (including posthumous collaborations with his wife,
Genevieve) only if you feel the need.  (Although, "Western Science is So
Wonderful" is an absolute hoot -- more like Rudy Rucker than Smith).

The idea is that you should read the middle stories, where the
Instrumentality figures prominently, first. You should absorb the
stories like you would absorb a huge, complex tapestry -- the
publication order would be better than the "history" order, but still
start with C'mell and Lord Jestocost.  Also, don't read the
introductions, timelines and afterwords until you've read everything
else.

No one should read the Narnia books starting with "The Magician's
Nephew."  No one should read Smith starting with "War 81-Q" (or whatever
else is first).

I am Of a Certain Age, and started reading the late, lamented Galaxy
about when "The Ballad of Lost C'mell" was published.  I was hooked, and
a great deal of the wonder of it all was figuring out what was going on
in the whole future span Smith imagined.

As they say, "the Golden Age of Science Fiction is twelve."

     -- vizcacha
     (david_lebling at avid.com)

ps: It is such a pleasure to find other Wolfe fans out there, and to
have them be Smith fans as well!  Ah, bliss.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net