[blue] Inhumic morality and dwellers in the deep

Alex David Groce · 03 Oct 1999, 15:50 · from whorl-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Alex David Groce <Alex_Groce at gs246.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: (whorl) [blue] Inhumic morality and dwellers in the deep
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 15:50:10
Message-ID: <whorl-v0010-0050 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0010/0050.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan Rabin asked:
>Morally repugnant to whom?  My interpretation of Krait's "cattle" metaphor
>and his comment "I must eat" is that the inhumi's drinking of blood is as
>matter-of-fact to them as eating fish is to Horn.  When leatherskins kill
>humans, are they being immoral?
<snippage>
>Or maybe inhumi aren't moral agents at all.

	The last is possible, but with Wolfe I think it's always best to
assume everything that looks intelligent and capable of willed action IS a
moral agent.  Wolfe seems to have a pretty broad definition of human (Horn,
at least, goes on about this at some length in OBW)--Jonas, Dr. Talos, sort
of Babbie, etc.  After all, the moral framework Wolfe's presumably working =
in
doesn't mean that just because the inhumi say "they're cattle--who cares?"
they're _right_ about it.  I think the inhumi are clearly more likely to be
moral agents than leatherskins.  Anyway, the inhumi seem (A) capable of bei=
ng
a bit gleefully cruel--Jahlee and Krait show this at times, a kind of aware=
ness
of villainy that's at the least a parody of moral agency and (B) capable of
acting quite in-inhuman--how do we explain Krait's actions on the lander (n=
ot
that we know exactly what happens yet) otherwise?  At least for now I'm giv=
ing
Krait the benefit of the doubt--he betrayed his kind for Horn, which was (so
it appears now) a good act.

It seems we're saying that Seawrack may be like an adopted Undine.  The mor=
e I=20
look at those sections (and the telling bit in the Dramatis Personae), the =
more
I think "Mom" is an Erebus/Abaia type thing (whatever they are) and clearly=
 Up
To No Good, although maybe resulting in good--BOT<N,L,S>S all evince Wolfe's
statement that (in the story of St. Brendan in PEACE, this quote is inexact)
"the wicked do God's will also, they just don't like it."


"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32
--
Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu)
Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department
8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net