Covers; Inhumi; Who is Horn?

David Lebling · 04 Oct 1999, 10:07 · from whorl-v0010.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "David Lebling" <David_Lebling at avid.com>
Subject: (whorl) Covers; Inhumi; Who is Horn?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 10:07:32
Message-ID: <whorl-v0010-0056 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/whorl/archives/v0010/0056.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

alga (I think) wrote that the cover illustration is wrong because it shows =
Horn
with a beard.  Just a little correction: the cover is clearly illustrating
Seawrack's return (about p. 240).  Just a few pages earlier Horn refers to =
his
beard.  (Besides, the fact that Horn shaves doesn't mean he can't have a be=
ard
-- lots of people with beards shave part of their face to keep the beard sa=
fely
confined to a limited area).  Horn should be bald, though, and Babbie could=
 use
a few more legs.  The boat looks a bit too big to me as well, to add another
nitpick; this is a boat that seems in danger of swamping every other chapte=
r.
'Way too much freeboard in that sucker on the cover for that!

On the subject of Babbie's limbs, I find it interesting (but wholly appropr=
iate)
that the Neighbors also have eight  (four legs and four arms, to be exact).
They also have fur.  I think Babbie is to a Neighbor as a chimpanzee is to a
human.

 *
* *

Dan Rabin wrote:
<<Morally repugnant to whom?  My interpretation of Krait's "cattle" metaphor
and his comment "I must eat" is that the inhumi's drinking of blood is as
matter-of-fact to them as eating fish is to Horn.  When leatherskins kill
humans, are they being immoral?>>

At one point Krait remarks that inhumi prey on humans preferentially, becau=
se
they like human blood better than that of other "cattle."  I think this is =
at
least morally suspect on their part.  This is worse than humans preferentia=
lly
eating chimpanzees or dolphins, I think: inhumi show little evidence (so fa=
r) of
being more intelligent than humans.

 *
* *

mantis opines:
<<Ah, the Horn who is writing (aka "the Rajan of Gaon") is one eyed and whi=
te
haired, like Odin.  But he also has a hurt ankle, is sometimes confused
with Silk by others (just because he's wearing the clothes, walking the
walk, talking the talk <g>), often confuses the names of his own twins
("Horn [sic] and Hide") as well as writing of Horn in the third person, and
even, in the very end, says that =3Dhe=3D caught the ball (at the beginning=
 of
TBOTLS)!  He =3Dis=3D Silk, in some as-yet-unspecified way. Not to mention =
the
intriguing "Passilk"!>>

I think that Passilk is the merging of Silk and Pas, hinted at in _Exodus_ =
and
nearly confirmed (by denial of first-hand knowledge) in _Blue_.  By extensi=
on, I
think that the "Horn" who is writing _Short Sun_ is Horn's mind in Silk's b=
ody
-- this must have happened at, near, or because of the death of Horn that he
speaks of on several occasions in _Blue_.  As to whether Silk's mind is the=
re
too, mantis's point about the ball is telling.

 *
* *

On the subject of the inhumi's secret, I have to disagree with alga.  There=
 are
several places (as I've previously pointed out) where Horn states that the
secret is something that would, if known, give humans some sort of advantage
against the inhumi.  It's explosive enough that Horn fears the inhumi will =
try
to kill him if it becomes known that he has it.  I doubt that inhumi surviv=
al
when inhumed (couldn't resist) is enough of a secret.  After all, inhumatio=
n is
only used in Gaon, and doesn't really seem to confer any sort of immunity. =
 Like
any sort of hostage-taking, it only confers an advantage if the victims all=
ow it
to, and it suffers from the same disadvantage that kidnapping has here on E=
arth:
first you have to catch your rabbit.

I'll dig up the references (Horn's hints on the secret) tonight, if I have =
time.

     --Dave Lebling
     (aka vizcacha)

ps: I'm already reading it a second time.  I couldn't stop myself.

*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/
*To leave the list, send "unsubscribe" to whorl-request at lists.best.com
*If it's Wolfe but not Long Sun, please use the URTH list: urth at lists.best.=
com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net