Urth Net

Index · 3 messages · 3 voices · 28 Aug 1998

Digest urth.v018.n007

Download this conversation
Kieran Mullen28 Aug 1998, 00:31originalas archived
Digest urth.v018.n007
↰ answers Peter Grimes · by quotation
Peter Grimes <grimes at waste.org> writes:
2 quoted lines
Ugh, I just can't let this go by unremarked. Illuminatus is garbage writing... [Stuff Deleted] .... Robert Anton Wilson and his co-conspirator are just not terribly good writers.
Very well put and very true. It is painful to see Wolfe and Wilson compared.
1 quoted line
So what if Foucault kills the conspiracy at the end? That's more or less the point of the book. Its about how an obsession with conspiracy leads someone to see them everywhere and in fact contributes to their creation.
I think FP suffers from poor editing. Eco was too big a writer to have his prose altered, I suspect. You could cut a fair bit of the middle bit out. That said, it's a brilliant criticism of Postmodernism, and a wonderful book. The fact that there is a supernatural reality (evidenced by the ectoplasm manifested in the church) is a oft overlooked sly twist. Kieran Mullen
Jack Lyons28 Aug 1998, 06:58originalas archived
↳ follows Kieran Mullen · by subject
On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, Kieran Mullen wrote: :Peter Grimes <grimes at waste.org> writes: : :>Ugh, I just can't let this go by unremarked. Illuminatus is garbage :>writing... [Stuff :> Deleted] .... Robert Anton Wilson and :>his co-conspirator are just not terribly good writers. : : Very well put and very true. It is painful to see Wolfe and Wilson :compared. Well, it's like comparing a rubber chicken to a Rodin scuplture. Both do have their uses, and I enjoy them both, though rarely together. As far as women in Wilson's book go - I seem to recall that Miss Portinari wasn't a sex object, and in fact had the mantle of Leader of the Illuminatus abdicated to her in the end, no small feat. I should also note that while nearly all of the women in ILLUMINATUS are indeed caricatured as sex dolls, the men get far worse treatment as dolts and morons. Take your pick which offends you more. I treat Focault's Pendulum as an entertaining prose history book, a mixture of book types in the same way MAUS mixed history and comics. Eco was having fun. Lighten up. :) Of course now that we have mentioned three books we can posit a Trinity connection...perhaps the rubber chicken represents the Host...
Michael Straight28 Aug 1998, 08:42originalas archived
↳ follows Jack Lyons · by subject
2 quoted lines
On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, Kieran Mullen wrote: I think FP suffers from poor editing. Eco was too big a writer to have his prose altered, I suspect. You could cut a fair bit of the middle bit out.
Absolutely not. That's like saying you could cut out a bunch of those repeated phrases in Ravel's Bolero. The fact that the long sections in the middle about all the conspiracies is interminable is part of the point. -Rostrum

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net