(no subject)
↰ answers Gerry Quinn
· by quotation
3 quoted lines
Gerry Quinn wrote:
If all Severian's lovers in BotNS are close relatives, his family would seem to be extraordinarily diverse and geographically dispersed. ?His lovers are spread (so to speak) ?from the slums of Nessus to the Autarch's Palace to villages in the interior and the minor aristocracy of provincial towns. They include pureborn exultants and those who are apparently lowborn, and some who are in between. ?If we include UotNS, we may add a woman from thousands of years in the past, and a female creature not borm on Urth, nor even in Urth's universe. ?But even leaving these two ?aside, the thesis seems improbable to say the least.
I suspect that Severian's lovers represent the different classes of the Commonwealth, linking him to all of them.
Thecla - exultant.
Valeria - armiger.
Dorcas - optimate.
Jolenta - commonalty.
Cyriaca - (former) religious.
Daria - servant of the throne.
Apheta - cacogen. (She would certainly be called that if she came to Urth.)
(The first four are explicitly listed as examples of those classes in the appendix to COTC. The others have not yet been introduced.)
Thecla's khaibit represents an anomalous group who don't really fit into the classification. Pia represents autochthons, a group which hasn't been highlighted when the classification is given. Gunnie/Burgunadofara can be seen as representing off-Urth humans, and the tall woman was born millions of years before the Commonwealth existed.
1 quoted line
Furthermore, apart from Dorcas there is just one woman mentioned in the story whom most agree is plausibly a close relative of Severian's. ?That is Merryn - and there is no indication that Severian has sexual relations with her. ?If Wolfe intended to indicate that Severian's lovers were hidden relatives, leaving Merryn out appears rather bizarre!
There is also a fair chance that Casdoe is a relation of his - likewise.