Urth Net

Index · 1 message · 11 Jun 2001

Fallible Narrators and Even More Fallible Copyists: a Textual Con sideration of the "Book of Silk" (a tangent)Whorl

Download this conversation
Alex David Groce11 Jun 2001, 13:39originalas archived
Fallible Narrators and Even More Fallible Copyists: a Textual Con sideration of the "Book of Silk" (a tangent)
↰ answers James Jordan · by quotation
2 quoted lines
Nutria wrote: FWIW, this is exactly and precisely what Roman Catholic James Blish does in his classic A Case of Conscience. Wolfe shares Blish's Thomism. Blish provides both a "nature" version of the story, and a "grace" version of the story, and only the "eye of faith" can see which version is the more "ultimate" explanation of events. It would not surprise me if Wolfe, who certainly knows Blish's work, would do the same thing.
Blish was Catholic? Somehow I'd gotten the impression he was, at some point, an atheist and at another point (I forget the ordering) an Anglican, and that heresies and theology were to a large extent more a hobby to him than a matter of faith. Was I off-base? Google doesn't quickly confirm either hypothesis for me.
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32 -- Alex David Groce (agroce+ at cs.cmu.edu) Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University - Computer Science Department 8112 Wean Hall (412)-268-3066 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net