Language (was: Time) and the New Sun

Dani Zweig · 14 Oct 1992, 01:52 · from sf-lovers.1992.mbox

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dani at netcom.com (Dani Zweig)
Subject: Re: Language (was: Time) and the New Sun
Date: 14 Oct 92 01:52:48 GMT
Message-ID: <sflovers-v17-540-2 at digest.sf-lovers>
X-Digest-Issue: SF-LOVERS Digest V17 #540
X-Urthmirror-Source: https://archive.org/details/sf-lovers-digest-vol-17b

cet1 at cus.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson):
>What relationship does the language spoken by Severian bear to English?

Essentially none.  What we see as English in the text is the language
spoken in the unthinkably remote future.  What we see as Latin is an
almost-as-remote language which, by Severian's time, is dead-but-respected
- - like Latin in ours.  (Did you notice that Valeria's translations from the
'Latin' are faulty?)

>Father Inire is made to say to Domnina: "Yet even though light is so
>weightless we have given its name to that condition...". This pun only
>makes sense in English or *very* closely related languages...

There will be people in the remote future who, like Wolfe and others today,
will have a love of language.  Should Wolfe avoid wordplay in his
characters' speech?  Or give us wordplay that fails completely, with a
footnote to the effect that it's brilliant in the original language?
There's no good answer for this.  Treating that language as if it were
English, and giving us derivations that work for English, seems a
legitimate decision, though not perfect.  We are being given the feel of
the character's speech, though it could be that in the 'actual' language,
the connection being made is between 'light' and 'freedom', to offer a
random example.

>"The dawn-men ... renamed it [Mars] Present. That was a jest in their
>tongue for the same word meant both _Now_ and _The Gift_. Or so one of my
>tutors once explained the matter to my sister and me, though I do not see
>how any language could endure such a confusion."
>
>So how is one to reconcile the two passages? 

Again, I don't see a problem.  The speech tells us about the speaker, not
about the language.  Besides, the language in question here is neither
English nor the language of Severian's time.  To which we add that the
speaker's philology (and her tutors') may well be suspect.

Dani Zweig

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net