Language (was: Time) and the New SunSF-Lovers

dani at netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes, apropos of TBOTNS:

Which gives me a peg to hang the following question on: what relationship does the language spoken by Severian bear to English? I offer the following two contrasting passages for your delectation: 1. In TSOTT, in Thecla's story, as retold by Severian to Agia in the Botanic Gardens, Father Inire is made to say to Domnina: "Yet even though light is so weightless we have given its name to that condition...". This pun only makes sense in English or very closely related languages, as far as I can trace the derivation of the words light (opposite of heavy) vs. light (opposite of dark). 2. In TCOTC, Thea says to Severian: "The dawn-men ... renamed it [Mars] Present. That was a jest in their tongue for the same word meant both Now and The Gift. Or so one of my tutors once explained the matter to my sister and me, though I do not see how any language could endure such a confusion." So how is one to reconcile the two passages? With any other SF author than Gene Wolfe, I would attribute one or other to a momentary carelessness, but I would be quite reluctant to assume that here. Chris Thompson cet1 at phx.cam.ac.uk

cet1 at cus.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson):

Essentially none. What we see as English in the text is the language spoken in the unthinkably remote future. What we see as Latin is an almost-as-remote language which, by Severian's time, is dead-but-respected - - like Latin in ours. (Did you notice that Valeria's translations from the 'Latin' are faulty?)

There will be people in the remote future who, like Wolfe and others today, will have a love of language. Should Wolfe avoid wordplay in his characters' speech? Or give us wordplay that fails completely, with a footnote to the effect that it's brilliant in the original language? There's no good answer for this. Treating that language as if it were English, and giving us derivations that work for English, seems a legitimate decision, though not perfect. We are being given the feel of the character's speech, though it could be that in the 'actual' language, the connection being made is between 'light' and 'freedom', to offer a random example.

Again, I don't see a problem. The speech tells us about the speaker, not about the language. Besides, the language in question here is neither English nor the language of Severian's time. To which we add that the speaker's philology (and her tutors') may well be suspect. Dani Zweig