Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Lexicon Urthus

Maru Dubshinki · 22 Jul 2005, 10:17 · from 2005-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marudubshinki at gmail.com (Maru Dubshinki)
Date: Fri Jul 22 10:17:00 2005
Subject: (urth) Lexicon Urthus
In-Reply-To: <18742859.1122051525111.JavaMail.root at wamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <18742859.1122051525111.JavaMail.root at wamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <f5238c305072210051f5abc46 at mail.gmail.com>

Argument time!  Cory Doctorow, who releases his novels in a
multiplicity of formats, many of which are more convenient to read
(such as Palm editions), estimates his sales have at least *tripled*
because of people tasting his novels online and then buying the print
version for perusal. I see no reason why the same principle would not
hold for LU-  would you buy a 30$ reference book sight unseen? With no
verification of the contents besides what a few reviews say? (Err...
That's a hypothetical you, just for the record.)

And as far as the third-party goes... I'm not surprised at all. The
surprise would be if the converse happened.  I mean, didn't LU not
sell out its first printing? Didn't a bunch of unsold copies have to
be auctioned off on Ebay?  That doesn't sound like a potential
blockbuster, or even a modest seller, unfortunately. Too restricted in
its appeal.

~Maru

On 7/22/05, James Wynn <thewynns at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> >...one could make an argument that online copies would not
> >cannibalize a print-on-demand edition. At least for me, physical text
> >is superior to bits, and worth paying for.
> 
> One could make that argument, but most people will never get around to
> actually crossing the line and buying a book -- particularly a $30 reference
> book -- if the same information is available for free...despite their best
> intentions. It's just human nature. Still, I'm surprised a third-party
> publisher has not successfully made a paperback offer that was financially
> worth Mantis' while.
> 
> I'm very proud of my particular copy, and I only wish more Gene Wolfe fans
> would visit my house so I could gloat over it.
> 
> J
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 


--

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net