sentient trees yes, usage no

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 03 Sep 2006, 01:36 · from 2006-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:36:27 -0700
Subject: (urth) sentient trees yes, usage no
In-Reply-To: <9c6b022b0609021348l56032252xb3d21de80270fd2a at mail.gmail.com>
References: <44F91AC8.4090101 at io.com>
	<BAY103-F6A2596580B8862E8DC49C883D0 at phx.gbl>
	<9c6b022b0609021348l56032252xb3d21de80270fd2a at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1f7617370609021836i7f372a78h142dbc508979a3f7 at mail.gmail.com>

On 9/2/06, Ranjit Bhatnagar <ranjit at moonmilk.com> wrote:
> And now for a new rule:
> Nitpicking the rules - AW, WHAT THE HECK. GO FOR IT.

I don't think that's a good idea, Yogi. The Ranger won't
like it.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant
-----
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
http://www.danehyoakes.com
I've got a piece of braaaaain lodge in me heeead!!!

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net