Urth Net

Index · 8 messages · 6 voices · 01 Sep – 03 Sep 2006

sentient trees yes, usage no

Download this conversation
Ranjit Bhatnagar01 Sep 2006, 19:30as archived
sentient trees yes, usage no
Here's the official word from the list owner (me!) -- Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED Talking about email formatting: STRONGLY DISCOURAGED "Interleaving": ENCOURAGED Top-posting: MILDLY DISCOURAGED Complaining about top-posting: STRONGLY DISCOURAGED Quoting the minimum necessary from previous posts to make your reply intelligible: STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. EXCESSIVE USE of CAPITAL LETTERS: discouraged. Sorry. - ranjit
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes01 Sep 2006, 19:42as archived
↳ in reply to Ranjit Bhatnagar
Ranjit, Thank you for clarifying. I wish you'd jump in more often!
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant ----- http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer http://www.danehyoakes.com I've got a piece of braaaaain lodge in me heeead!!!
Jeff Wilson02 Sep 2006, 05:46as archived
↳ in reply to Ranjit Bhatnagar
3 quoted lines
Ranjit Bhatnagar wrote: Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED
Truly separable? Jeff
Matthew King02 Sep 2006, 16:37as archived
↳ in reply to Jeff Wilson
5 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Sep 2, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote: Ranjit Bhatnagar wrote:
Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED
Truly separable?
Not when we're discussing Able's narration, or that of the Horn twin who contributed to Return to the Whorl. matthew
Bob Miller02 Sep 2006, 20:39as archived
↳ in reply to Jeff Wilson
Speaking of literature and speaking of language usage are topics that can not be separated. Communication requires reasonable language use.
3 quoted lines
Ranjit Bhatnagar wrote: Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED
Truly separable? Jeff
Ranjit Bhatnagar02 Sep 2006, 20:48as archived
↳ in reply to Bob Miller
2 quoted lines
Bom Miller wrote: Speaking of literature and speaking of language usage are topics that can not be separated. Communication requires reasonable language use.
Look, just think of these as like Asimov's three laws of robotics. Only there's just two of them that I'm concerned with here, but bear with me:
4 quoted lines
I wrote: > Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD > Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED...
....except where such discouragement would conflict with the First Law. And now for a new rule: Nitpicking the rules - AW, WHAT THE HECK. GO FOR IT. - ranjit
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes03 Sep 2006, 01:36as archived
↳ in reply to Ranjit Bhatnagar
3 quoted lines
On 9/2/06, Ranjit Bhatnagar <ranjit at moonmilk.com> wrote: And now for a new rule: Nitpicking the rules - AW, WHAT THE HECK. GO FOR IT.
I don't think that's a good idea, Yogi. The Ranger won't like it.
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, writer, trainer, bon vivant ----- http://www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer http://www.danehyoakes.com I've got a piece of braaaaain lodge in me heeead!!!
b sharp03 Sep 2006, 02:41as archived
↳ follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · by subject
3 quoted lines
Ranjit wrote: Talking about the works of Gene Wolfe: GOOD Talking about matters of English usage: DISCOURAGED...
....except where such discouragement would conflict with the First Law.
2 quoted lines
And now for a new rule: Nitpicking the rules - AW, WHAT THE HECK. GO FOR IT.
High praise to Ranjit for just the right amount of authority and self-deprecation :-) -bsharp

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net