Urth Net

← back to the conversation

from National Review Online

Fernando Q. Gouvêa · 30 Mar 2009, 16:44 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: fqgouvea at colby.edu (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Fernando_Q=2E_Gouv=EAa=22?=)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:44:09 -0400
Subject: (urth) from National Review Online
Message-ID: <49D0F6D9.2010105 at colby.edu>

Wolfe Man [John J. Miller]

Today's Between the Covers podcast is with Gene Wolfe 
<http://radio.nationalreview.com/betweenthecovers/post/?q=MmQ2ZjA2OGE4ZWNmZjBkMGQ1MjRjYjlhOTA4YmU2OWE=>, 
the legendary science-fiction writer. Here's what /The Encyclopedia of 
Science Fiction/ says about him:

    Though neither the most popular nor the most influential author in
    the sf field, [Wolfe] is today quite possibly the most important.

How's that for an endorsement?

In our interview, we discuss his new anthology of short stories, the 
book that he thinks will be his legacy, and the influence of G.K. 
Chesterton on his work. At the end, he says this:

    I am a conservative. I certainly read William F. Buckley, Jr. with
    delight?I think he mellowed a little too much at the end?He wasn't
    as sharp-edged as he really should have been. Perhaps the same thing
    will happen to me.

Listen in ? and subscribe to the whole BTC series on iTunes!

-- 
=============================================================
Fernando Q. Gouvea
Carter Professor of Mathematics
Colby College                     Editor, MAA FOCUS
5836 Mayflower Hill               Editor, MAA Reviews
Waterville, ME 04901              http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/19/
http://www.colby.edu/~fqgouvea

There are no physicists in the hottest parts of hell, because the 
existence of a "hottest part" implies a temperature difference, and any 
marginally competent physicist would immediately use this to run a heat 
engine and make some other part of hell comfortably cool. This is 
obviously impossible.
   -- Richard Davisson


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net