from National Review Online

Lane Haygood · 30 Mar 2009, 17:07 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: lhaygood at gmail.com (Lane Haygood)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:07:55 -0500
Subject: (urth) from National Review Online
In-Reply-To: <49D0F6D9.2010105 at colby.edu>
References: <49D0F6D9.2010105 at colby.edu>
Message-ID: <FAEB9F7A-BCC7-479E-BE3A-B697F1C70DF6 at gmail.com>

I just can't bring myself to support the NRO. Is there a transcript  
somewhere?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:44 AM, "Fernando Q. Gouv?a"  
<fqgouvea at colby.edu> wrote:

> Wolfe Man [John J. Miller]
>
> Today's Between the Covers podcast is with Gene Wolfe <http://radio.nationalreview.com/betweenthecovers/post/?q=MmQ2ZjA2OGE4ZWNmZjBkMGQ1MjRjYjlhOTA4YmU2OWE= 
> >, the legendary science-fiction writer. Here's what /The  
> Encyclopedia of Science Fiction/ says about him:
>
>   Though neither the most popular nor the most influential author in
>   the sf field, [Wolfe] is today quite possibly the most important.
>
> How's that for an endorsement?
>
> In our interview, we discuss his new anthology of short stories, the  
> book that he thinks will be his legacy, and the influence of G.K.  
> Chesterton on his work. At the end, he says this:
>
>   I am a conservative. I certainly read William F. Buckley, Jr. with
>   delight?I think he mellowed a little too much at the end?He wasn 
> 't
>   as sharp-edged as he really should have been. Perhaps the same thing
>   will happen to me.
>
> Listen in ? and subscribe to the whole BTC series on iTunes!
>
> -- 
> =============================================================
> Fernando Q. Gouvea
> Carter Professor of Mathematics
> Colby College                     Editor, MAA FOCUS
> 5836 Mayflower Hill               Editor, MAA Reviews
> Waterville, ME 04901              http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/19/
> http://www.colby.edu/~fqgouvea
>
> There are no physicists in the hottest parts of hell, because the  
> existence of a "hottest part" implies a temperature difference, and  
> any marginally competent physicist would immediately use this to run  
> a heat engine and make some other part of hell comfortably cool.  
> This is obviously impossible.
>  -- Richard Davisson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net