from National Review Online

brunians at brunians.org · 30 Mar 2009, 19:46 · from 2009-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: (urth) from National Review Online
In-Reply-To: <44fb53d10903301106j25272296x5ca6982566200707 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <49D0F6D9.2010105 at colby.edu>
	<FAEB9F7A-BCC7-479E-BE3A-B697F1C70DF6 at gmail.com>
	<39744B7F3490462988710A4E4545855C@eMachinePC>
	<44fb53d10903301106j25272296x5ca6982566200707 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <10002.67.142.130.49.1238442381.squirrel at brunians.org>

Matt Keeley writes:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:27 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I doubt it, but you could listen to the interview at the site and just
>> not click the ads. Then you are just leeching their bandwidth; hoisting
>> them on their own petard, so to speak. If you don't allow yourself to be
>> dusted just a little by evil conservative dandruff, you won't know what
>> you are hating.

> I can bring myself to visit lefty websites, so surely a short visit to
> the NRO won't kill anyone?

> I love the way this comes up right after the whole "Politics of Gene
> Wolfe" debacle.

I thought that was a very lively conversation. I certainly did learn a lot
from it.



.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net