Nobody loves me, everybody hates me, I'm gonna....

Charles Dye · 13 Oct 1998, 17:56 · from urth-v0019.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: raster at highfiber.com (Charles Dye)
Subject: (urth) Nobody loves me, everybody hates me, I'm gonna....
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 17:56:18
Message-ID: <urth-v0019-0104 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0019/0104.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The Spectacled Bear in RNA World:

>I do know what Kieran meant about RNA, though: there was a theory
>around for a while that RNA was the carrier of memory. Back in the
>1970's (ish) someone taught planarian worms to run a T-shaped maze,
>then fed them to other planarian worms, and put those worms into
>the maze. They appeared to guess which way to turn more often than
>chance would allow. There naturally followed a lot of stories based
>on that, often making much of the cannibal belief that you could
>absorb your enemies' strength and other virtues by eating them. This
>account is taken from what I recall of the introduction to one such
>story, so it may not be scientifically or historically accurate, but
>it reflects the author's understanding, which is what matters here.
>The experiment seemed to suggest that memory must be carried chemically
>(cell structures wouldn't survive being ground up and eaten) and RNA
>was a favorite contender for the role. I believe the theory has gone
>away now, though.

I've heard about this too.  In the original experiment, the second
set of worms did a far better job of solving the maze than the first
group.  However, it turns out that if you *wash* the maze between the
first and second sets of worms, the second group does no better than
the first -- whether they eat their predecessors or no.  So yes, that
theory "has gone away."

raster at highfiber.com

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net