Today, a Sea Slug. Tomorrow, ... ?

Jerry Friedman · 18 Jan 2010, 04:14 · from 2010-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jerry_friedman at yahoo.com (Jerry Friedman)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Today, a Sea Slug. Tomorrow, ... ?
In-Reply-To: <92f04c0926e3c47a86eabf9d054e8154.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com>
Message-ID: <866004.91683.qm at web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

--- On Sun, 1/17/10, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:
> > Severian's friend the Green Man
> always seemed quite plausible to me. I
> > hadn't realized just how plausible. Apparently a sea
> slug has
> > incorporate algae genes into its genome and produces
> and uses
> > chlorophyll inside its body:
> >
> > http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/53496/title/Sea_slug_steals_genes_for_greens,_makes_chlorophyll_like_a_plan

That's pretty amazing, if it's confirmed.

> There's still a question of him being able to intercept
> enough sunlight to
> be more active than a slug. A man-sized silhouette in
> Earthly conditions
> intercepts less than 100 calories worth of sunlight a day.

Is that with perfect efficiency?  Gosh, are you seriously
telling me to do the calculation?  Half a square meter in
sunbathing position, 1 kilowatt, 8 hours, that's 14,400
kJ or about 3400 big calories.  You're assuming something
like present photosynthetic efficiency.

> From the Green
> Man's sunny smile, his people apparently still have
> humanlike teeth, so
> presumably they can eat a variety of food to make up the
> deficit, but I'm
> not sure if reducing your food needs by 1/30 is worth the
> hassle.

The sun could be brighter in his time than ours, and genetic
engineering could have improved the efficiency of
photosynthesis and that of metabolism.

> It might be that the chlorophyll isn't strictly for food,
> but for sensory
> purposes; can anyone think of an occasion when the Green
> Man would need to
> be able to feel a shadow falling on him, or would have to
> distinguish
> between bright lights of different character?

I can't  We do fine with vision.  Though human color
vision is rather klugy, I gather, and those same
genetic engineers could probably improve it without
any cost by making it more like birds'.

Jerry Friedman

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net