Wall of Nessus

Roy C. Lackey · 10 Jun 2010, 09:05 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rclackey at stic.net (Roy C. Lackey)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:05:56 -0500
Subject: (urth) Wall of Nessus
References: <000901cb080c$a24bd6a0$3dd14a0c@rclackey><AANLkTimNF_7phiZuvwCMYZObOBCVpmbPVbROd7kc1Hq4 at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimpfoDwNPVflVSDV3jrpe5SuXvILqeI43LjzXEi at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <008e01cb087c$267bb700$59cc4a0c@rclackey>

Josh Caswell wrote:
> I wonder if anything can be taken from what we see with Baldanders
> (separate and together with) and the other giants of the sea.  Perhaps it
is
> an issue of growth, both of size and power; the walls may have once been
> thought to have been enough or maybe it was known that they were only a
> minor or more correctly temporary dissuasion to those from the sea.

I had the same thought. <g>

And an afterthought: Those long sections of the Wall down south, where there
are no Ascians, makes more sense if the Wall was originally intended to
thwart another foe, perhaps one that came from the seas to either side of
the continent.

-Roy

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net