Is Agia a Robot?

Jeff Wilson · 20 Jun 2010, 17:42 · from 2010-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:42:32 -0500
Subject: (urth) Is Agia a Robot?
In-Reply-To: <4C1E46D7.1050106 at verizon.net>
References: <AANLkTik8q4okRfHDUjNPoRh68A6eWmfNwUq7cf5HfOQd at mail.gmail.com>	<4C1B32C6.5030907 at io.com>	<a2a9234fa189632637dbf500b34ecc88.squirrel at brunians.org>	<4C1B7A59.1090406 at verizon.net>	<f33ba678b6152753adbcf652dbeb9483.squirrel at brunians.org>	<FEFD6649-58AB-45D7-ADF1-BBCDC5AF4892 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1B8EE9.6090706 at verizon.net>	<36006D71-A703-4BE6-AB12-C541923ADD88 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1B97F1.7020902 at gmail.com>	<6F357DDC-786A-45FC-8C3B-1BB454062421 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1BB20D.4040700 at verizon.net>	<B62D2A47-885D-44CE-8E06-6F05A20BBF49 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1BC1B5.40302 at verizon.net>	<311585F1-22C0-4306-8809-7D039B4C3713 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1BC643.7060305 at verizon.net><E38CE2D5-F728-4B50-9438-7A480D82C426 at liftingfaces.com>	<4C1BD16F.6060808 at verizon.net><003f01cb0f63$bb925720$d4cd4a0c@rclackey><4C1CB094.5030900 at verizon.net>	<015001cb0fed$feb79120$1ad24a0c@rclackey>	<7F99406962A94BDFBDE416CD02F74BB8@jill>	<4C1DD1CA.3000002 at io.com>
	<4C1E46D7.1050106 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4C1E5308.5010909 at io.com>

On 6/20/2010 11:50 AM, David Stockhoff wrote:
> I'd prefer to rest a theory on at least 3 data points. If she's not a
> "hard robot":
>
> ---Her strength has another source
> ---She could still be the poppet
> ---Agilus could be her actual twin IF she's a genetic/flesh android or
> just human

I think the poppet's stretches in the box are not suited to anything 
like a vertebrate: the bit about smiling when it closes so she can be 
smiling when it opens indicates her muscles don't relax during periods 
of inactivity. The whole sharp sound episode demonstrates Agila's 
muscles positively relax when her consciousness is interfered with.

As for her strength, she's ruthless and cold, like Lady MacBeth sought 
to be. She may also have a bit more innate strength than usual for her 
size, perhaps because rather than just sex toys, A&A's line was intended 
to be conjugal domestics; this way a slight manservant can be just as 
good at opening jars and moving furniture as a full-size. And it may not 
be muscle, it could be a more ready adrenaline rush.

> After giving away the hard-robot part, is it needed that A&A be anything
> other than human at all? It's not strictly necessary that Agia be the
> poppet; it may be enough that Hethor recognizes something in Agia that
> he likes---it could be as simple as that she is passive in bed and
> dominating/controlling otherwise, although I doubt her ability to even
> fake being passive if she's human. Perhaps Hethor needs both dominance
> and submission.

Agia owns up to doing all the kinky things that Hethor likes, so she's 
at least capable of bottoming if not actual submission. I think her 
determination is such that she could and would submit to anything short 
of a SAW movie that would further her revenge on Severian and the world 
in general, at least in the short term.

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
IEEE Student Chapter Blog at
< http://ieeetamut.org >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net